Vietnam Syndrome and its Effects on the Gulf War Strategy

Síndrome do Vietname e os seus Efeitos na Estratégia da Guerra do Golfo

Authors

  • Baturay Yurtbay Yeditepe University, Turkey.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21814/perspectivas.113

Keywords:

The Vietnam Syndrome, The Gulf War, Vietnam Syndrome, Weinberger, Shultz

Abstract

The Vietnam War killed and wounded many soldiers and civilians. US foreign policy began to shift after the War’s, end including discussions on the level of power to be used for future wars or conflicts. The United States experienced considerable anxiety over its failures in Vietnam, which was coined the Vietnam Syndrome by the media and various political sciences scholars. The Gulf War, the first serious use of US military power after the Vietnam War, began with discussions about the suitable use of force and how the Vietnam War Syndrome could be overcome. While the Vietnam War was a huge failure for the United States, it also paved the way for new discussions on US foreign policy dealing with appropriate use of force, including last resort uses and US vital interests. These discussions are considered as the corner stone for the US success in the Gulf War. This study will briefly explain the effects and consequences of the Vietnam War and the Gulf War as well as analyse US foreign policy discussions between the Vietnam War and the Gulf War. While examining US foreign policy and the US intervention in the Gulf War, this research will mainly focus on the Shultz doctrine and the Weinberger doctrine. This study will show that the Vietnam War started many discussions on  the use of  force and its application in future wars that were part of the US Gulf War military strategy. Even though the United States experienced failure in the Vietnam War, the lessons taken helped to govern future conflicts and the most important clues were seen in the Gulf War.

Resumo

A Guerra do Vietname resultou num grande número de mortos e feridos. A política externa dos EUA iniciou assim um processo de mudança, que incluiu discussões sobre o nível de poder que pode ser utilizado em futuras guerras ou conflitos, num momento em que os EUA sofriam a ansiedade causada pelo fracasso no Vietname - apelidado Síndrome do Vietname pela comunicação social e por várias publicações científicas políticas. A Guerra do Golfo, enquanto primeira tentativa séria de conflito dos EUA após a Guerra do Vietname, deu inicio a discussões sobre até que ponto o uso da força é adequado e de que forma a Síndrome da Guerra do Vietname poderia ser superada. Este estudo explicará os efeitos e consequências da Guerra do Vietname e da Guerra do Golfo, além de analisar as discussões de política externa dos EUA que ocorreram entre a Guerra do Vietname e a Guerra do Golfo. Ao analisar a política externa dos EUA e a intervenção dos EUA na Guerra do Golfo, esta investigação irá concentrar-se sobretudo na doutrina de Shultz e na doutrina de Weinberger, e, de seguida, avaliará a Guerra do Vietname e a Guerra do Golfo no contexto do construtivismo.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Baturay Yurtbay, Yeditepe University, Turkey.

Research Assistant in the Department of Sociology of Yeditepe University.

References

Campbell, Kenneth J. 1998. “Once Burned, Twice Cautious: Explaining the Weinberger-Powell Doctrine.” Armed Forces and Society 24: 357-74.

Freedman, Lawrence, and Efraim Karsh. 1991. “How Kuwait Was Won: Strategy in the Gulf War.” International Security 16(2): 5-41.

Herring, George C. 1991. “America and Vietnam: The Unending War.” Foreign Affairs, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/vietnam/1991-12-01/america-and-vietnam-unending-war

Garofano, John, and Ronald Steel. 2001. “The Gulf War’s Legacy.” The Wilson Quarterly 25(2): 3-5.

Janette, Michele. 2002. “What We Talk about When We Talk about War.” Contemporary Literature 43(4): 784-793.

Herring, George C. 1981. “The ‘Vietnam Syndrome’ and American Foreign Policy.” Virginia Quarterly Review 57(4): 594-374.

Regan, Ronald. 2013. “The Gulf War”. In Just War: 177- 183. Washington D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.

Shultz. 1984. “Power and Diplomacy in the 1980s”. Speech before the Trilateral Commission, Washington, D.C., April 3, 1984.

Vasquez, John A. 1997. “War Endings: What Science and Constructivism Can Tell Us.” Journal of International Studies 26(3): 651-678.

Weinberger, C. W. 1984. “The Uses of Military Power.” PBS, November 28. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/military/force/weinberger.html

Zhang, Xiaoming. 1996. “The Vietnam War, 1964-1969: A Chinese Perspective.” The Journal of Military History 60(4), 731-762.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-27

How to Cite

Yurtbay, B. (2018). Vietnam Syndrome and its Effects on the Gulf War Strategy: Síndrome do Vietname e os seus Efeitos na Estratégia da Guerra do Golfo. Perspectivas - Journal of Political Science, (18), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.21814/perspectivas.113

Issue

Section

Articles