Article 7 - Green horizons – Towards more sustainable trade after the TSD Review


  • Eline Blot



EU trade agreements, sustainable development, enforceability, monitoring mechanisms, civil society


All eyes are on the European Commission following the communication on a new approach to Trade and Sustainable Development (TSD) Chapters in EU Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). The focal point of EU trade policy recently shifted back towards bilateral trade agreements with a greater scrutiny on the sustainability objectives embedded in the TSD Chapters such as tackling global emergencies including the climate crisis, deforestation, and biodiversity loss. But what does this new approach entail, and how effective will it be at improving the monitoring and enforceability of the TSD Chapters? This article reviews the new TSD Chapter approach and assesses its overall objective to address sustainability concerns linked to international trade. The article discusses missed opportunities for enhancing sustainability in EU trade agreements and reflects what the new TSD approach could mean for newly concluded and ongoing trade agreements.


Download data is not yet available.


Arróniz Velasco, I., & Peters, J. (2022). How EU trade deals can increase climate action. Retrieved from

Blot, E., & Kettunen, M. (2021). Environmental credentials of EU trade policy: A comparative analysis of EU free trade agreements. Retrieved from Brussels and London:

Blot, E., Oger, A., & Harrison, J. (2022). Enhancing sustainability in EU Free Trade Agreements: The case for a holistic approach. Retrieved from Brussels:

de Melo, J., & Solleder, J.-M. (2020). The EGA Negotiations: Why They Are Important, Why They Are Stalled, and Challenges Ahead. Journal of World Trade, 54(3), 333-347. Retrieved from DOI:

European Commission. (2022a). EU-Chile: Text of the agreement. Retrieved from

European Commission. (2022b). EU-New Zealand: Text of the agreement. Retrieved from

European Commission. (2022c). Operating guidelines for the Single Entry Point and complaints mechanism for the enforcement of EU trade agreements and arrangements. Brussels Retrieved from

European Commission. (2022d). The power of trade partnerships: together for green and just economic growth. Brussels: European Commission; Retrieved from

European Commission Services. (2018). Feedback and way forward on improving the implementation and enforcement of Trade and Sustainable Development chapters in EU Free Trade Agreements [Press release]. Retrieved from

European Economic and Social Committee. (2022). 2nd DAG-to-DAG meeting under the EU-Vietnam FTA. Retrieved from

Halleux, V. (2022). Towards deforestation-free commodities and products in the EU. Retrieved from

Harrison, J., & Paulini, S. (2020). The Trade and Sustainable Development Chapter in the EU-Mercosur Association Agreement. Retrieved from

Henriot, C., & Van den Berghe, A. (2021). A new blueprint for environmental provisions in EU trade agreements. Retrieved from

IEEP, Trinomics, IVM, & UNEP-WCMC. (2021). Methodology for assessing the impacts of trade agreements on biodiversity and ecosystems. Retrieved from Brussels/London:

ILO. (2022). International Labour Conference adds safety and health to Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Retrieved from

Kettunen, M., Dudley, N., Gorricho, J., Hickey, V., Krueger, L., MacKinnon, K., . . . Sekhran, N. (2021). Building on Nature: Area-based conservation as a key tool for delivering SDGs. Retrieved from Brussels:

Kettunen, M., Gionfra, S., & Monteville, M. (2019). EU Circular Economy and Trade Report. Retrieved from Brussels & London:

Lafortune, G., Cortés-Puch, M., Mosnier, A., Fuller, G., Diaz, M., Riccaboni, A., . . . Oger, A. (2021). Europe Sustainable Development Report 2021: Transforming the European Union to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from

Mazzola, A. (2018). The role of Domestic Advisory Groups in monitoring the implementation of Free Trade Agreements. Retrieved from

Moens, B., & Hanke Vela, J. (2022, 28 September 2022). Brussels looks to evade EU capitals to get Mercosur deal done. POLITICO. Retrieved from

Nienaber, M. (2016, 17/09/22). Tens of thousands protest in Europe against Atlantic free trade deals. Reuters. Retrieved from

POLITICO Pro. (2022, 10 November 2022). Europe: Response to Single Entry Point complaint postponed. Morning Trade Newsletter: Big Pharma threats — Foreign subsidies — Warning on China.

Šajn, N. (2022). Ecodesign for sustainable products. Retrieved from

Shapiro, J. (2021). The Environmental Bias of Trade Policy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(2), 831-886. Retrieved from DOI:

Titievskaia, J., Morgado Simões, H., & Dobreva, A. (2022). EU carbon border adjustment mechanism: Implications for climate and competitiveness. Retrieved from

Toni, A., & Tubiana, L. (2021, 02/04/22). Mercosur trade deal threatens to wreck EU’s climate credibility. EURACTIV. Retrieved from

Transnational Institute. (2022). Six reasons NOT to ratify the EU-Mexico Global Agreement. Retrieved from

United Nations. (2022). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2022. Retrieved from

Van Beers, M. (2022). On non-compliance by the Colombian and Peruvian Governments of Chapter IX, on Sustainable Development, of the Trade Agreement with the European Union. Retrieved from

Voituriez, T., Cremers, K., Guimarães, A., Moutinho, P., & Zerbini Benin, O. (2022). Lula’s election: A blessing for a green EU-Mercosur Association Agreement? Retrieved from

Wittkopp, K., Ghislain, S., Fournier, P., & Ulmer, K. (2018). Planting the forest at the root of the EU-Indonesia trade relationship - Joint Paper. Retrieved from




How to Cite

Blot, E. (2022). Article 7 - Green horizons – Towards more sustainable trade after the TSD Review . Perspectivas - Journal of Political Science, 27.