Nova Gestão de Recursos Humanos na Administração Pública Portuguesa
New Human Resource Management in Portuguese Public Administration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/perspectivas.2675Keywords:
Gestão de Recursos Humanos, Administração Pública, PortugalAbstract
Human Resource Management has changed according to the type of State and the model of public management. After a classic period, in which, in truth, there was no management, the New Public Management (NPM) was adopted, which, in terms of human resources, tends to bring public management closer to business management. Efficiency constitutes the maximum value to be pursued, having adopted methods and techniques of business management, such as performance evaluation based on objectives, individual employment contract, outsourcing and financial autonomy. With the 2007/2008 crisis, the State centralized the management of human resources. The objective was now to control public expenditure, with public services responsible for a large part of this expenditure. The same happened in Portugal, having become more sophisticated in the last two years.
Resumo
A Gestão de Recursos Humanos mudou conforme o tipo de Estado e o modelo de gestão pública. Depois de um período clássico, em que, em boa verdade, não havia gestão, foi adotada a Nova Gestão Pública (NPM), que, em termos de recursos humanos, tende a aproximar a gestão pública da gestão empresarial. A eficiência constitui o valor máximo a prosseguir, tendo-se adotado métodos e técnicas de gestão empresarial, como a avaliação de desempenho com base em objetivos, o contrato individual de trabalho, a terceirização e a autonomia financeira. Com a crise de 2007/2008, o Estado centralizou a gestão de recursos humanos. O objetivo era agora controlar a despesa pública, sendo que os serviços públicos eram responsáveis por grande parte dessa despesa. Aconteceu o mesmo em Portugal, tendo vindo a sofisticar-se nos últimos dois anos com a reforma da função pública que se traduz no recrutamento centralizado dos funcionários e na criação de uma espécie de “senior civil service”. Estas reformas foram definidas em vários instrumentos normativos que começaram a ser implementados no início deste ano, pelo que ainda é cedo para avaliar o seu impacto.
Downloads
References
Althaus, Catherine, e John Wanna. 2008. “The Institutionalization of Leadership in the Australian Public Service.” In Public Leadership: Perspectives and Practices, editado por Paul Hart e John Uhr. Australian National University Press.
Aucoin, Peter. 1995. “Politicians, Public Service and Public Management: Getting Government Right.” In Governance in Changing Environment, editado por Guy Peters e Donald J. Savoie. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press. Crozier, Michel. 1964. The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Downs, Anthony. 1967. Inside Bureaucracy. Nova Iorque: University of Chicago Press
Hood, Christopher. 1996. “Exploring Variations in Public Management Reform of the 1980.” In Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective, editado por James Perry e Theo Toonen. Indiana: Indiana University Press. Lampropoulou, Manto.2020. “Policy Responses to the Eurozone Crisis: A Comparative Analysis of Southern European Administrations.” Public Policy and Administration 35(3): 289-311.
Magalhães, Filipa Matias. 2019. “Alicerces para a Construção de Uma Função Pública mais Qualificada e Motivada: Constrangimentos e Oportunidades.” In Descomplificar o Orçamento de Estado de 2019, coordenado por Filipa Matias Magalhães e Maria Leitão Pereira. Lisboa: Vida Económica Editorial.
Mintzberg, Henry. 1983. Structuring Five: Designing Efective Organizations. Toronto: Prentice-Hall.
Mosher, Frederick. 1968. Democracy and the Public Service. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press.
Nunes, Alexandre, e Diogo Cunha. 2018. “The Health Care Reform in Portugal: Outcomes from both the New Public Management and the Economic Crisis.” International Journal of Health Planning Management 34: 196-215.
OECD. 2019. Recomendação do Conselho sobre Liderança e Competência na Função Pública. OECD.
Olsen, Johan P. 1996. “Civil Service in Transition: Dilemmas and Lessons Learned.” The European Yearbook of Comparative Government and Public Administration, editado por Joachim Jens Hesse e Theo Toner. Nomos.
Pollit, Christopher, e Geert Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis - New Public Management, Governance and Neo Weberian State. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press.
Krotel, Sara et al. 2019. “New Life for Old Ideas: Explaining the Widespread Adoption of Weberian Inspired leadership Model in Danish Municipalities.” In Public Management Research Conference (PMRC). Chapel Hill.
Randma-Liiv, Tiina, e Walter Kickert. 2017. “The impact of the Fiscal Crisis on Public Administration Reforms: Comparison of 14 European Countries.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 19(2): 155-172.
Redford, Emmette S. 1969. Democracy in the Administrative State. Nova Iorque: Oxford University Press.
Riper, Paul Van. 1979. “Americanizing a Foreign Invention: The Pendleton Act of 1883.” Classics of Public Personnel Administration, editado por Frank Thomson, 4-14. Oak Park, lll: Moore Publishing Company.
Rocha, J. A. Oliveira. 2010. Gestão de Recursos Humanos na Administração Pública. Lisboa: Escolar Editora.
Rocha. J. A. Oliveira, e Joaquim F. Araújo. 2007. “Administrative Reform in Portugal: Problems and Prospects.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 73(4):583- 596.
Rourke, Francis. 1976. Bureaucracy, Politics, and Public Policy. Boston: Little Brown and Comp.
Schmidt, Eduard et al. 2017. “A Change Management Perspective on Public Sector Cutback Management: Towards a Framework for Analysis.” Public Management Review 19(10): 1538-1555.
Torfing, Jacob, e Eva Sorensen. 2019. “Interactive Political Leadership in Theory and Practice: How Elected Politicians May Benefit from Co-Creating Public Value Outcomes.” Administrative Sciences 9(51): 1-18.
Weber, Max. 1947. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Nova Iorque York: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Perspectivas - Journal of Political Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors must be sure that they have permission to reproduce copyright material, prior to submitting their articles to this Journal.
Authors must secure permission if they have permission to reproduce figures, tables, or any extract from the text of another source. This applies to direct reproduction as well as to any derivative reproduction.
In assigning copyright, authors retain their right to use their own material elsewhere, provided that the Journal is acknowledged as the original place of publication, and the Editorial Team is notified in writing in advance.
Further information on copyright policy please contact info@perspectivasjournal.com
